Saturday, July 2, 2011

Nicole Kidman Isabella Connor 2010

images 2011 Kidman brought Connor and Nicole Kidman Isabella Connor 2010. Isabella and Connor
  • Isabella and Connor


  • PD_Dec2002
    08-15 06:38 PM
    FYI...

    My friend and his wife received Receipt Notices for 485, EAD and AP on August 10, 2007. The Received Date (when application reached NSC) was June 25, 2007. And yesterday (August 13, 2007), his wife's EAD was approved. They still haven't gotten their FP notices as yet.

    BTW, their packet was transferred from NSC to TSC since the I-140 was approved from TSC. It appears TSC is faster in processing EADs/APs than NSC.

    Other details: I-140 was PP-approved from TSC in June 2007 and the application is EB2.

    Thanks,
    Jayant




    wallpaper Isabella and Connor Nicole Kidman Isabella Connor 2010. Isabella Kidman-Cruise
  • Isabella Kidman-Cruise


  • sledge_hammer
    02-12 02:31 PM
    You are missing the point here again and taking whatever I said out of context!

    Read the OP's issue again. She never said that she did not understand the laws fully. In fact both her and her desi consulting company know the immigration laws too well and have found loopholes to take advantage of it, which is morally wrong. Now tell me if it is wrong when I say this; If you know you are going out of status because you do not have a job, and you still do not change your status back to H4 in the hopes that you'll eventually land a job, then you have no right to stay in this country.

    Please refrain from bringing in the refugees, their struggle and hardships and try to dilute what I have been saying in this entire thread!

    Sledge_Hammer - You are so shallow in your thinking!

    Every rule in this world has a human aspect. I urge you to grow up. Immigration rules in this country are so complex that even lawyers conflict with each other. We are simple human beings and most of the time we do not fully understand the law. Yes, it does not give us the authority to break the law, however, there are times when you become "out of status" by just sitting at home. There are times when you become victim of situation. I have 1000s of refugees in my city who flee Yugoslavia/Bosnia during ethnic cleansing/genocide of 1990s. US working with UN gave them refugee status and most of them have green cards now. Some of them lost sons, some of them lost fathers and they all have stories to tell. Do I go there with my MS/BS degree and tell them that I was in the line before and I should have gotten the GC before them? No! Do I curse the system for that? No! When countries fall apart and when morality/humanity hits the rock bottom, rules, status go right out of the window.

    Please do not be so harsh on forums.


    I do not have anything personal against you but there are times when you are very harsh on individuals and that changes the whole course of discussion.




    Nicole Kidman Isabella Connor 2010. Preparations For Nicole Kidman
  • Preparations For Nicole Kidman


  • zeta7
    06-22 01:36 PM
    Hey all,

    I completed my landing in Toronto some 4 weeks ago. My pertinent details:
    -No valid H1B stamp in passport
    -485 was filed
    -Planned on using AP to return

    The risk at the time (since there was no clear consensus here) was returning to the US using AP with a Canadian Immigrant visa stamp in my passport. I should point out that my passport was literally a year old, and the Canadian visa was bang in the middle pages; it popped out as soon as the passport was flipped open. It couldn't be missed.

    Toronto immigration was smooth. The only comment the officer made was that I had only a week left before my Canadian visa was due to expire, and she was surprised I had waited till the last minute (I suspect she'll be seeing quite a few more cases like this soon though!). I provided a Canadian address to receive my PR card over there.

    I spent two days only in Canada. I decided to travel across the Atlantic and meet up with the family since I was leaving the U.S. anyways. Plus I figured on returning, if I was asked what the purpose of my travel was, I could honestly say "visiting family" as opposed to beating about the bush about the Canadian PR.

    I returned 2 weeks later to NY-JFK. At the immigration counter I was asked to go to a separate desk to have my AP paperwork done. The Officer there asked me what my area of employment was, which I responded to. I was then asked to wait. 20-30 minutes later I was called again and my passport and AP documents were returned. No other questions were asked.

    I was extremely paranoid about the whole thing, but there were literally no issues. Of course luck plays a big part, so it's up to you to roll the dice; chances of problems arising seem low though.


    It's been almost 4 weeks and I still haven't received the Canadian PR card; if anyone else has an idea of how long it takes, I'd appreciate it if they could apprise me. Also I'm under the impression that since I'm not earning any income in Canada, there is no tax paperwork to be filed there. Is this correct?




    2011 Isabella Kidman-Cruise Nicole Kidman Isabella Connor 2010. Nicole Kidman Wishes Connor
  • Nicole Kidman Wishes Connor


  • gc_maine2
    07-05 09:38 AM
    Reached NE at 9.45 signed by rob pitcher.



    more...

    Nicole Kidman Isabella Connor 2010. kids Isabella, Connor and
  • kids Isabella, Connor and


  • GCStatus
    09-15 02:36 PM
    You can do all you want and be as blunt. USCIS doesn't have to answer to you. Stop chanting the "HIGHLY SKILLED", paying all taxes, nonsense. You were not brought to the USA at gun point. You chose to come (and stay). The USA can just put one ad in the newspaper anywhere in the world and there will be 10 million highly skilled NEW people they can bring. They do not need you (us). It is important to remember that we are not doing anyone a favor by being here except yourselves.

    Again, because USCIS is so BIG and has millions of applications to process they can say they are trying their best and cannot reply to each individual.

    Vivek Ahuja - Apparently you didnt read the note completely or misunderstood it. All we are saying is be consistent or give our money back.

    Yes, we chose to come COZ we were offered to come. We are not complaining here. We want them to follow basic rules.

    On a side note, if they dont need immigrants not sure why they created H1B?

    No one is doing anyone any favor here. We want everyone do their job.

    And not sure whats your agenda of sending this note other than being extremely rude and ignorant.




    Nicole Kidman Isabella Connor 2010. Connor and Isabella Cruise at
  • Connor and Isabella Cruise at


  • BharatPremi
    03-26 01:15 PM
    BharatPremi, I hope your predictions are either met or excelled. I will pray for the happiness for your future 7 generation :-). After waiting for so many years, even 2009 does not sound that bad. I know I have no right to complain since many in EB3 have been waiting for years before me.

    I also agree that porting to EB2 is not easy. A couple of my friends had their PERM labor itself rejected. I think waiting it out in EB3 may not turn out to be that bad. Or I do hope so....

    Thanks. Yes, if EB3 PD is on or before DEC 2003 then it would not be that bad now.



    more...

    Nicole Kidman Isabella Connor 2010. Nicole Kidman is a mom of
  • Nicole Kidman is a mom of


  • saptaswara
    05-09 10:13 PM
    The views expressed in the context of sending grammatically correct letters is appreciated. As such, it would make sense if we can send the same letter, which would not only emphasize the same point but would be grammatically correct as well :)

    Sending poorly drafted letters may not speak well of our community please

    Regards,

    Saptaswara




    2010 Preparations For Nicole Kidman Nicole Kidman Isabella Connor 2010. 2011 Kidman brought Connor and
  • 2011 Kidman brought Connor and


  • cjain
    11-01 05:18 PM
    pls try to understand...my statement is valid for beyond the 180 day period....i agree that one should not change before 180 days irrespective of whether the I-140 is approved or not...

    the question is after the 180 day period..and my point is aytes memo clearly states that the I-140 need not be approved..

    So what? I-140 was "approvable" but now employer revokes it and therefore 485 denial becuase 180 days have not been passed. And that is why one never should even try to use AC21 before 180 days period. Even I-140 is already approved, revocation of it will initiate 485 denial.



    more...

    Nicole Kidman Isabella Connor 2010. Nicole Kidman has spoken out
  • Nicole Kidman has spoken out


  • joshraj
    10-03 04:50 PM
    Anyone with filing date on July 27, post on http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=14095

    Thanks




    hair Nicole Kidman Wishes Connor Nicole Kidman Isabella Connor 2010. Nicole Kidman Isabella Cruise.
  • Nicole Kidman Isabella Cruise.


  • desi3933
    07-08 01:20 PM
    Your perspectives go well beyond what an average immigrant thinks about the whole EB system.

    I have seen people "NOT" being themselves and do everything at workplace ONLY because their GC is pending and they do not want to have issues with employer for the sake of GC.

    In my opinion, which also complements urs, the whole employment thing - if viewed from the eyes of a common man - one whose immigration status is not tied up with employer, is completely different.

    I have seen people facing cultural issues, community issues and a wide range of issues - such things get masked when one's focus is on the GC process, heck leave alone GC - people struggle for even getting h1b and maintaining it.

    It all comes down to priorities. If someone's aim to have GC at any cost, he/she will do everything to get to the finish line -- i.e. 180 days past I-485. In my opinion, GC process should be part of life, and it should not hijack 100% of time of highly skilled professional. No wonder, we see so many posts where person is waiting for AC-21 so as to get rid of "blood-sucking employer". For a neutral person, both employee and employer are using system to suit their needs.

    Some people will go the extent of using term "slavery", whereas, actually, their thought process is slaved to the GC process.

    And, employers know this very well and try to use to their advantage.

    A lot of people I talk to who come fresh out of school or have 2 years of experience or so, think that they have certain skills and employers would not live without them - whereas it is THEIR struggle to maintain h1b and also work towards GC on long run. All this is nothing but lack of thought process that people must apply but will not because their primary aim is to work out a sponsor.

    >> have 2 years of experience or so, think that they have certain skills and employers would not live without them
    You have described it very well. I have met many of such professionals while interviewing them for jobs. But, the reality is, these same professionals are scraed of their jobs being outsourced.

    Some are simple cookie cutter prgrammers and compare themselves to reasearch scientists and technologically superior.

    Another thing, I have noticed is that while on H-1B, vast majority of professionals claim that they are getting paid prevaling wages, but, on the other hand, they also claim they can make upto 50% more, if they had EAD or green card. Ironic! Isn't it.

    I am not blaming an employee or employer for this but this entire EB based system is set up in that way.

    You are right. These are the rules set by current EB immigration system.

    With this so called "exploitation" by whole Employment Based Immigrations, these professionals turn blind eye to whole thing after getting Green Card. Afterall they are, rightly, professionals.

    How many times we see any green card holder or citizen supporting fellow immigrants?

    H1 does not care for F1.
    EAD does not care for H1/F1.
    GC holder does not care for EAD/H1/F1
    Citizens wonder why immigration level is so high.

    Taking a quote from MTV Roadies program, each professional (roadie) is alone and has to look after his own best interests.

    .



    more...

    Nicole Kidman Isabella Connor 2010. then-wife Nicole Kidman,
  • then-wife Nicole Kidman,


  • shaikhshehzadali
    06-13 08:00 PM
    No. U can't...All the application should go to Nebraska




    I am not an attorney...Information may not be correct




    hot kids Isabella, Connor and Nicole Kidman Isabella Connor 2010. Nicole Kidman Connor Isabella
  • Nicole Kidman Connor Isabella


  • romeshtrisal
    09-14 01:07 PM
    finally got to know from my bank that checks were encashed. checked the receipt nos. on back of checks. notice receipt date is 10the sept.
    i had mailed the papers on july 27th and NSC receipt date was 30th july.



    more...

    house Kidman, who adopted Isabella, Nicole Kidman Isabella Connor 2010. hot nicole kidman isabella.
  • hot nicole kidman isabella.


  • singhsa3
    11-21 10:06 AM
    It is really sad to hear that. I am no expert by any means but assuming that you are still a young family (say in mid thirties), I would suggest that unless your family is financially secure and have other family members here in the USA to lean on, I will suggest to at least consider the option of going back, irrespective of what the outcome of you green card process may be.




    tattoo Connor and Isabella Cruise at Nicole Kidman Isabella Connor 2010. But Isabella and Connor,
  • But Isabella and Connor,


  • english_august
    07-09 10:58 PM
    Well there is a lot of media attention already. I've been talking to so many reporters and there was a huge interest in the event.

    Tomorrow, there will be a bunch of media people at USCIS to talk about this, yet in the entire DC area, only nixstor is available to go to USCIS.

    How can we expect major media to cover us when we are not willing to participate in something that is of benefit to us?



    more...

    pictures Nicole Kidman is a mom of Nicole Kidman Isabella Connor 2010. Rabbit Hole, Nicole Kidman
  • Rabbit Hole, Nicole Kidman


  • desi3933
    07-10 06:50 AM
    Problem with that argument once you own more than 5% of the company you will have file as investor. If your wife owns the company then you will have file under relative category. There were denials based on this.

    Total BS. Do you have any reference link for case denials?

    You are confusing filing new I-140 with employer (where beneficiary has >5% share) with AC-21 job change.


    .




    dresses Nicole Kidman Connor Isabella Nicole Kidman Isabella Connor 2010. NICOLE Kidman is feeling
  • NICOLE Kidman is feeling


  • buddyinsd
    08-27 12:38 PM
    Another case I can remember is andycool on this forum

    Thanks, hopefully my spouse gets her approval soon. She got SLUD on 8/21 and is current.



    more...

    makeup Nicole Kidman has spoken out Nicole Kidman Isabella Connor 2010. Kidman, who adopted Isabella,
  • Kidman, who adopted Isabella,


  • gc_lover
    07-20 07:35 AM
    I will contribute 100 $ towards this cause. Just tell me when and where.

    Thanks for everything!




    girlfriend But Isabella and Connor, Nicole Kidman Isabella Connor 2010. Isabella Kidman Nicole
  • Isabella Kidman Nicole


  • chandarc
    07-21 10:24 AM
    chandarc July 12 2010 --------------- Automated email response


    First I like to thank you all those whose support me in this action of trying to eliminate the country and category based spillover usage. I see that there are lot of unrelated comments and discussions going on in this forum, let's not get ourself diverted and please focus on our mission to try to implement the usage of spill over visas based on priority date. There may be some unrelated comments still coming in, also some may discourage our actions, let's please ignore those, instead of responding (which just feeds them to write more).

    I like to know who all have already contacted their local Congressman/woman for this issue. so let's take a poll by adding your IV id to the following list,

    IV Id----------------Week of Contact-------------------Any update
    Sanhari --------------- July 12 2010 --------------- Automated email response

    Thanks again to all those who support this cause, let's continue to do our part and hope for the best for us to happen soon....




    hairstyles then-wife Nicole Kidman, Nicole Kidman Isabella Connor 2010. Isabella Kidman-Cruise
  • Isabella Kidman-Cruise


  • salai007
    08-13 11:45 AM
    My lawyer went to the SC and dropped the papers on July 2, still I am waiting for my receipt#....does anybody in my situation like this?

    Regards,
    -Salai




    sam_hoosier
    12-17 10:09 AM
    That may be so but the number of those who choose to stay/would rather stay is overwhelming compared to those who don't ;)

    I agree. Most people are risk averse & the decision to go back is a tough one. However, more people are considering that option now than ever before. And the ones that I know have gone back are pretty happy with their decision.




    GCStatus
    09-15 12:26 PM
    Friends,

    I have created a Shared Spreadsheet with the list of people who have pledged in favor of this effort.
    http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=pgWehhQEb3jqwsRC8fcKLTQ&hl=en#

    Everyone can view it, but unfortunately, i didn'y think it was ideal for everyone to edit. I will be more than happy to grant Edit access to a few more folks who are willing to help. Also, from security point of view, i think we should add our IV handle instead of real name. Since we have email ID's and ph#, we can be in touch as soon as it it time for action.

    Please keep sending me ur details to add to this list. Remember, we only proceed if we have atleast 1000 pledged members.

    I will keep publishing this sheet from time to time on this thread so people know.

    Please keep pouring in with ur suggestions.

    And we will proceed if its more than 1000 too ;-)



    No comments:

    Post a Comment